Answered this week · inside the Boardroom

Routers, cheap video, 200 images, Grok bots and your first agent.

Five questions came in this week and every one of them has a clear answer.

Whether Claude Code Router beats OmniRoute for an Agent OS setup.

What to use instead of Higgsfield when the monthly cost stops making sense.

How to make two hundred images without paying per picture.

What Grok bots are actually good for, and how to build your first Hermes agent.

Here is each question as it was posted, with my answer underneath it.

question one · claude code router Skool post titled Something new: Claude Code Router, asking how CCR compares to OmniRoute for stability, routing, subagents and which to recommend for an Agent OS workflow Read the original post on Skool ↗

They do the same job. One is already wired in.

Both of them are a local gateway that sits between your coding agent and whichever models you want to use.

OmniRoute is the one plugged into the Agent OS already, and it is what I run day to day.

Claude Code Router is heavier, and the extra weight is the point — it is a control plane with a dashboard.

This is the shape both tools take. Your agents stop knowing about providers, and one thing in the middle decides where each request goes.

What you actually get from each

Straight answer on the recommendation: if OmniRoute is working, keep it. Reach for Claude Code Router when you want to see what every request actually did, or you want fallbacks when a provider goes down.

Test it without breaking your setup

ten minutes, fully reversible
npm install -g @musistudio/claude-code-router
ccr ui
The gateway comes up on 127.0.0.1:3456 and the dashboard on 127.0.0.1:3458. Add a provider, point one agent at it, and leave everything else exactly as it is.
1. Point a spare agent at it first — never the one you work in.
2. Run a normal day's work through it and watch the log: model, latency, tokens, cost.
3. If the log tells you something you did not already know, keep it. If it does not, you have your answer.
4. Honest caveat — I have not run a long head-to-head on stability, so test it on your own work before you move anything important.
"A router earns its place when it shows you something you couldn't see before."
question two · cheaper text to video Skool post asking for affordable text-to-video alternatives to Higgsfield, with a list of what they want to know including price per month and cost per generated second Read the original post on Skool ↗

Work out your cost per second. Then stop paying for most of it.

Credit pricing is confusing on purpose, so turn every tool into one number before you compare anything.

Then the real saving: most of what people generate does not need a generator at all.

Generate one clip, note the credits it burned and how many seconds you got. That single number lets you compare any two tools honestly, and it is the only number the pricing page will not give you.

Where the money should actually go

Split your video into two piles before you pay anybody.

Almost everything in the second pile can be made for nothing.

The demo clips and animations across these guides are authored and rendered locally. No credits, no per-second cost, and they never expire with a subscription.

1. Run the same prompt through two or three tools and record credits used and seconds out. That is your real comparison.
2. Check whether the tool has an API before you commit — if you cannot call it from your agent, it will not stay in your workflow.
3. Buy the cheapest plan that gives API access, not the biggest one. Credits usually roll over badly.
4. Move everything that is text, charts, UI or screen capture out of the generator entirely. That is normally most of the runtime.
5. Prices and models change monthly, so re-run step one every few months rather than trusting last year's answer.
"Pay for the shot you cannot make. Author everything else."
question three · 200 images, no api bill Skool post from Neil Martin asking for the best image generator, hitting ChatGPT usage limits with 200 images still to create, on a Mac Mini M4 Pro with 24GB Read the original post on Skool ↗

Your Mac can make all two hundred. Overnight, for nothing.

First, one correction that saves you a lot of time: Ollama runs language models, not image models, so it will not help here.

What will help is an image model running on the same Mac — an M4 Pro with 24GB is comfortably enough.

Three different things people mix up. The middle one is what you have been using and hitting limits on. The right-hand one has no limits at all because it never leaves your desk.

The plan for two hundred images

1. Install a local image app on the Mac — Draw Things is the easy one, ComfyUI if you want more control. Both are free and both run on Apple Silicon.
2. Pull one good open model and stop shopping. The model matters far less than your prompt template.
3. Write one prompt template for the campaign and change only the subject line per image. That is what keeps two hundred pictures looking like one campaign.
4. Lock the seed and the size. Same seed plus same style words is how you get a consistent look instead of two hundred strangers.
5. Queue them in batches and let it run while you sleep. Cost is electricity.
6. Keep the paid generator for the five images that carry the campaign, and let the local one do the other one hundred and ninety-five.

And keep the ones you already made. They are the style reference you feed the local model so the new batch matches the old.

Skip the guesswork

Get the setup already wired.

Every one of these answers is something a member asked and got the same day.

The full Agent OS — router, models, video and image tools in one dashboard
The model line-up I actually run, and what I swap when something better lands
Free local models for the everyday work, so the meter is not always running
The video and image workflows behind everything on this page
Live coaching calls every week — bring the exact thing that is stuck
4,000+ founders across 38 countries, and me in the chat
Get the Agent OS → Inside the AI Profit Boardroom · skool.com/ai-profit-lab
Set up in an afternoon · used in 38 countries · new tools added the week they ship
question four · grok bots Skool post from Ale G asking whether anyone has used Grok Bots, with Julian's reply linking a tutorial and an open source alternative Read the original post on Skool ↗

Great fun. Runs out of tokens fast.

I have a full tutorial on Grok Bot, and an open-source alternative that does the same job without the limit.

Both walkthroughs are below — the honest catch is that the token allowance goes in about twenty minutes of real use.

The Grok Bot walkthrough — what it is and how to run one.
OpenMausBot — the open-source version, side by side.

That is the whole recommendation. Try the hosted bot to understand the shape of it, then move to the open version before you build anything you depend on.

"Try the hosted one to learn it. Run the open one to keep it."
question five · your first hermes agent Skool post from Amita Bhatt asking how to set up specialized agents for different tasks in Hermes, with Than Vavoulis replying that you describe the task to Claude or Codex and they build the agent Read the original post on Skool ↗

An agent is a profile. One command makes one.

In Hermes, a specialised agent is just a profile with its own model, its own instructions and its own skills.

Than is right in the comments too — you can describe the job to Claude or Codex and have it build the agent for you.

What you are watching: a real session on my machine. One command makes a new SEO-writer agent that inherits my model and all 193 skills, and it gets its own command name straight away.

make an agent
hermes profile create seo-writer --clone-from julian \
  --description "Writes SEO articles from a keyword and a transcript"
Swap the name and the description for the job you want. --clone-from copies your working setup so the new agent starts with your model, keys and skills instead of nothing.

The description is the part people skip. It is what the Kanban orchestrator reads when it decides which of your agents should pick up a task, so write it like a job title.

1. Name it after the job, not the model. seo-writer ages well, kimi-agent does not.
2. Clone from a profile that already works so it inherits your keys, model and skills.
3. Write the description as one plain sentence about what it does. That is what the board matches jobs against.
4. Open its SOUL.md and tell it how to behave — house style, what to never do, what good output looks like.
5. Give it one job and use it for a week before you make a second one. Most people make six agents and use none.
6. Or do what Than said: describe the job to Claude or Codex in the Agent OS and let it write the profile and the SOUL file for you.
Ask the next one

Five questions. All answered the same day.

Every question on this page came from a member, and every one got a straight answer within hours.

That is the whole point of the room — you bring the thing you are stuck on instead of losing a weekend to it.

You also get the Agent OS itself, the model line-up, the video and image workflows and live calls every week.

Get the Agent OS → Inside the AI Profit Boardroom · skool.com/ai-profit-lab
4,000+ members · 38 countries · live calls every week · someone online 24/7