Jev · TypeSafe AI · launched 15 Sep 2026 · all three doors tested 21 Sep

3 Free Ways To Use Jev AI Right Now

Here are three free ways to use Jev AI, and one of them closes in a few days.

Jev is the new AI model from TypeSafe, and it does something no chatbot does.

It doesn't write, it decides, and it picks an answer in under half a second.

One door takes zero signup, so you can be running it about ten seconds from now.

Stick with me, because there's one thing you have to understand about Jev before you trust its answers.

Three free doors into a model that only decidesDoor 1 · playground · no signupDoor 2 · Vercel · closes 25 SepDoor 3 · OpenCode Zen · free model nameJev AIdecides in a blinkfree right nowOne of them has a deadline on it
The three doors + the actual sources ↓
§1Meet Jev

A new AI model that doesn't write

Jev, in three facts15 Sep2026 · launch dayTypeSafe AIthe company0 wordsit will ever write youNo emails. No explanations. No paragraphs.
§2What you get back

What it gives you is a decision

You hand it two things. It hands back one.A situationa message, a ticket,a note, a recordYour answersbilling · technicalyes / no · 0 to 4Jev picks oneabout a tenthof a secondIt can only pick from the answers you'll accept
§3The problem

The Tiny Decisions Problem

What your AI actually spends its day doingIs this email worth a reply?yes / noWhich folder does this go in?pick oneReal lead or time waster?pick oneIs this task finished?yes / noShould I stop and ask a human?yes / noHow urgent is this?0 to 4Most of it is sorting, and most of it isn't writing
§4Old way vs new way

Every tiny decision costs you a full, slow AI call

Same decision, two ways to get itOLD WAYseconds eachfull trip to a big chat modelit thinks out loudit writes you a sentenceyour software digs the answer outand hopes it got it rightNEW WAY~0.1s eachone small call to Jevit picks from your listthe answer is already typedthe odds come with ityour software just actsJev takes that whole step and shrinks it
THINKING IT? "My AI already makes these decisions fine."

It does. It also spends seconds writing a sentence every time, when the answer was one word.

One agent run can hold dozens of those small decisions.

It doesn't write. It decides.
§5Who built it

Two years in stealth, and $40 million behind it

Who is behind JevDiogo Almeidafounder · ex-OpenAI2 yearsbuilding in stealth$40Mseed · led by DCVCSo this isn't a weekend project
sources: TypeSafe AI launch essay · FinSMEs funding report · 16 Sep 2026
§6People noticed fast

Around 13% of teams on Vercel, on day one

Share of Vercel AI Gateway teams using it after 24 hoursJev · TypeSafe AI~13% of paid teamsGPT-5.6 familyabout half of thatFable 5.1about a sixth of thatVercel's own numbers, not an outside audit
source: Vercel blog · “By hour 24, nearly 13% of paid teams were using it.”
§7The three free doors

Three free ways in, from easiest to most useful

The three free doorsDoor 1 · a playground · no signupDoor 2 · Vercel · free until 25 SepDoor 3 · OpenCode Zen · a free model nameJev, freeright nowthree doorsTen seconds · full strength · the one I'd build on
§8Door 1

A free playground. No signup. No card.

real screen recording · jevplayground.com · the real model · recorded 21 Sep 2026

What you're watching: the real jevplayground.com, driven live. Three examples run one after another: a refund check comes back 99% yes in 246 ms, a double charge goes to Billing at 100% in 312 ms, and an outage scores 4 out of 4 in 292 ms.

Open jevplayground.com →independent test bench · not TypeSafe's own site · usage limits apply
§9What comes back

It gives you probabilities

Their published test · 18 September · example one0.99refund happened?905 mswith all the lagA note said a full refund was issued. Jev: 0.99 that it's true.
source: jevplayground.com/what-is-jev · their own published results
§10Two more

Billing got 100%. The outage scored four.

“I was charged twice” → which team?Billing100% · 399 msTechnical0%Sales0%Other0%Their published test · 18 September
“Complete outage, all customers” → how urgent?4 / 4Critical693 mswith all the lagA score on your own scale, zero to four
§11I ran them too

You ask. It answers. It tells you how sure it is.

real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: the same three questions, run by me on the free model. Refund 0.98, Billing at 100%, urgency 4 out of 4 — each with its odds attached.

three examplesnot a benchmark~1.0s from my desk, lag included
§12Why the number matters

The odds let your system do something smart

What a number next to the answer unlocksNear certain → act on it by itselfIn the middle → send it for reviewNot sure → stop and ask a humanThe oddscome withevery answerA normal AI gives you a sentence and no way to tell
It hands you the odds.
§13Door 2

Vercel has it free until 25 September

4
days left on the Vercel free windowVercel's model page: “Promotional pricing ends on September 25, 2026.”
real run · Vercel AI Gateway · my machine · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: the full-strength door. One lead email goes through Vercel AI Gateway and comes back routed, scored and graded — then the credit check shows a balance of 5 and nothing used.

source: vercel.com/ai-gateway/models/jev · price shown as Free
§14The one annoying step

Add a card. Don't buy credits.

The step between you and the full modelBUY CREDITSpaid tieryou top up on purposeaccount moves to the paid tierthe free monthly credit endsfine later onwrong move for a first tryADD THE CARDstays freeno card → “verification” erroradd a card, buy nothingfree monthly credit unlocksrequests start workingthen leave it aloneAnnoying, and it's the only step
source: Vercel docs · “To use free AI Gateway Credits, add a valid payment method” · “Once you purchase credits, your account transitions to the paid tier”
§15Door 3

OpenCode Zen has a free version of Jev in its model list

real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: one request to OpenCode Zen with the free model name. The refund check comes back 0.98 and the reply carries cost: “0”.

the whole change is one word
curl https://opencode.ai/zen/v1/systemone \
  -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
  -d '{
    "model": "jev-1.13-free",
    "state": "Support note: the agent issued a full refund...",
    "questions": {
      "refund_issued": {
        "type": "noul",
        "instructions": "Was a refund issued to the customer?"
      }
    }
  }'
source: opencode.ai/docs/zen · “Use jev-1.13-free instead of jev-1.13 to use the limited-time free model.”
§16Why I'd build on it

A one-line change, not a new account

If your agents already call models through a gatewayNEW PLATFORMan afternoona new accounta new carda new set of instructionsa new key to look afterone more place to checkNEW MODEL NAMEone linesame keysame setupsame place as everything elseswap one word to go paid laterread the data policy firstFree windows sometimes come with different terms
Read the Zen data policy →worth two minutes before you send anything sensitive
§17Your three

A playground, a deadline, and a free model name

The three free doors, side by sideDoor 1 · Playgroundno signup · 10 secondsDoor 2 · Vercelfree until 25 SepDoor 3 · OpenCode Zenjev-1.13-freeEasiest · full strength · the one to build on
Four days.
§18Built this week · 1

Long AI sessions fill up, and summaries lose detail

The normal way to keep a long session goingLong sessionmemory fills upSquash it down“write a summaryof everything”Detail is gonethe file name,the exact errorThe thing you told it forty minutes ago
§19fast-jev-compaction

Keep the real words. Let Jev decide what still matters.

How Tamara Tran's plugin does itYour wordskept wordfor wordThe AI's wordskept wordfor wordOld tool resultsJev: stillrelevant?Drop or trimfalls back to asummary if Jev failsOne yes-or-no per old tool result
One reported runBeforenearly 1,000,000 tokensAfter86,000 tokens · 1 secondA launch-week report, not my measurement
fast-jev-compaction on GitHub →MIT licence · Claude Code plugin
§20On my own sessions

Losing detail is the thing that costs the most time

my own test · a saved session · Jev via OpenRouter · replayed

What you're watching: the same idea run on one of my own saved Claude Code sessions. Jev marks each old tool result keep or drop, and the session falls from 330,052 tokens to 258,284.

§21Built this week · 2

A browser that starts moving before you finish the sentence

real recording · moritzkremb/jev-voice-browser · my machine

What you're watching: Moritz Kremb's voice browser running on my machine. Words stream in, Jev decides while the sentence is still going, and the page moves early.

“go back” → ~300 msdecides while you talk
§22Built this week · 3

Flights found in seven seconds

Browser agents running on Jev7sBrowser Use · flights$0.0039for that whole task$0.001Kyle Jeong · one taskA fraction of a cent per task
source: madewithjev.com · build pages for browser-use-flights and stagehand-remote-browser
§23Launch-week reports

500 emails for three and a half cents

What builders said it cost them500 emails sorted$0.0351,018 papers classified$0.08Self-reports from launch week, not independent tests
$0.042 per million tokens inoutput: free
source: madewithjev.com · 500-emails-3-cents · 1kpapers · rate from TypeSafe's launch essay
§24Back to normal

Your inbox, sorted into four folders

real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: a 48-email sample inbox going through the free model. 45 of 48 land in the right folder in 8.4 seconds, 5 come back under 0.60 sure, and 2 of the 3 misses sit under that line.

real customersupplierjunkreply today
§25Hot or cold

Form fills, graded the second they land

real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: 24 contact-form messages graded hot or cold on the free model. All 24 land on the right side, and the ones in the middle go to a person.

§26What changes

You stop checking once a day and start checking all the time

When decisions get cheap, you make far more of themSLOW + COSTLYdailyyou ration the thinkingcheck the inbox each morninggrade leads in a batchreview tasks on Fridaythings wait for youFAST + CHEAPall the timeyou check everythingevery email as it landsevery form the second it's sentevery task as it movesnothing waitsThat's the real change
§27 Where it plugs in

Get a decision layer sorting your leads and running your agents

Inside the AI Profit Boardroom you get the Agent OS — one place for Claude, Hermes and OpenClaw, sharing one memory. A decision layer like Jev sits underneath it.

The Agent OS zip file — plug in Claude, Hermes, OpenClaw, all of it, in one place with one memory
A decision layer underneath — sorting the leads, grading the enquiries, picking what each agent does next
The 30-day roadmap for putting it in, plus the video walkthrough
Updates every time we improve it
Four coaching calls a week — bring your own setup and get it sorted live
Daily tutorials and 3,900+ business owners — plenty had never touched AI before joining
Join the AI Profit Boardroom →Inside the AI Profit Boardroom · skool.com/ai-profit-lab
4 live calls a week · daily tutorials · used in 38 countries
THINKING IT? "Doesn't running an Agent OS burn a fortune in tokens?"

No. The everyday work runs on free local models and free APIs, and the big jobs use the Claude and Codex plans you already pay for.

Small decisions go to something like Jev, which costs close to nothing. And there are token-efficiency tutorials inside the Boardroom.

§28Before you build

“Zero hallucinations” is about the shape of the answer

What TypeSafe's “zero hallucinations” actually promisesYour listbilling · technicalsales · otherJev answersalways oneof those fourNever a fifthno made-up option,no broken formatA guarantee about the box, not about being right
source: typesafe.ai · “Zero Hallucinations”
§29Inside the box, still wrong

It says nothing about whether the answer is right

real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: a message that fits none of the options. With no “other” on the list, Jev files “Can I bring my dog to the workshop?” under sales at 98%, with confidence 0.96.

type safe ✓correct ✗two separate things
Inside the box, and still wrong.
§30The second trap

Probability and confidence are different numbers

The published exampleBilling · probability84%Technical · probability15.9%Confidence0.596The odds favour billing, and it's telling you it's not sure
real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: three real tickets on the free model. Billing wins all the way down to 84% with confidence 0.78, and a muddled ticket drops to 0.42.

example numbers: MarkTechPost write-up of TypeSafe's release · 19 Sep 2026
§31Three paths

The line should move with the cost of being wrong

What their docs suggestHigh → act on itMiddle → send it for reviewLow → send it to a personConfidenceone numberper answerThat gap is the useful part
Same model, two very different linesWRONG FOLDERlow bara message gets misfiledyou move it backnobody noticesset the line lowlet it runAUTO REFUNDhigh barreal money leaveshard to undothe customer noticesset the line higha person signs offCheap mistakes get a low bar. Costly ones get a high bar.
source: docs.typesafe.ai/confidence · act automatically · proceed with caution · route to a human
§32The third thing

Jev explains nothing

When each one gets it wrongCHAT MODELreadableshows its reasoningyou see where it went sidewaysyou fix the prompt thereslow, and readablea thought processJEVa numbera wrong answerand a numberthat's itchange the questionchange what you feed itYou debug the input, not a thought process
§33Feed it the bit that matters

What you feed it decides everything

real run on the free model · OpenCode Zen · jev-1.13-free · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: one question — is this task finished? — and three versions of the state. One thin line of log gets 0.22, the failed import gets 0.02, and the clean import gets 0.79.

Trim first, then askEverything you havethreads, logs,old ticketsCut it in your codekeep the bitthat mattersThen ask Jevshort state,clear questionTypeSafe's guidance: unrelated input drags accuracy down
§34The benchmarks

Around 67.8% — on TypeSafe's own test

TypeSafe's four-workflow evaluationGPT-5.6 Sol74.1%GPT-5.6 Terra67.9%Jev67.8%It measures agreement with two big chat models
workflows written by TypeSafe“correct” = two frontier models averagedrun it on your own stuff
source: evals.typesafe.ai · averaged over four workflows with equal weight
§35Speed and cost

0.114 seconds against 8.566 seconds

TypeSafe's recorded demoJev0.114 sGPT-5.6 Terra8.566 sTheir numbers, their demo
up to 200× fasterup to 400× cheaper on classificationfrom TypeSafe's own tests
§36Last thing

Text only. And it can't write.

What Jev can read right nowText✓ goes straight inImages✕ describe it in wordsAudio✕ not yetVideo✕ not yetWant it to judge something visual? Describe it first.
The pattern people are landing on: bothJevpicks the queueA writing modelwrites the replyJevpicks the next stepA writing modeldoes the stepJev decides. The other model does the words.
Promising. Not settled. Test it on your own stuff.
§37Why now

Brand new and free, through three doors

4
days left on the Vercel free windowVercel's model page: “Promotional pricing ends on September 25, 2026.”
Every free door has a limitVercelshuts on the 25thOpenCode Zenlimited timePlaygroundusage limits, alwaysThat combination doesn't last
§38You might be thinking

“This moves too fast.” “That's for developers.”

Wrong: “This moves too fast, I'll never keep up.”
Right: You don't have to catch everything. Catch the things that change how the work gets done. Instant, near-free decisions mean you stop rationing the thinking.
Wrong: “That's for developers, not me.”
Right: The playground needs no signup and no card. If you can open a website and press a button, you can see exactly what this does.
Wrong: “I'm starting too late.”
Right: Plenty of people in the Boardroom had never touched an AI tool before they joined, and they run full agent systems now. Starting late isn't the problem. Not starting is.
Don't take my word for it

Members post their wins every day — agency owners, ecom founders, course creators, solo operators across 38 countries.

Read the 158-page wins doc →
§39The honest version

Jev is a piece. It's the part that decides.

A decision does nothing until something acts on itAgents · do the workMemory · knows your businessHandoffs · pass work alongActions · something happensJev decidesone pieceof the systemWhich is the whole reason we built the Agent OS
§40 Your move

Put Jev inside a system that does something with those decisions

Come join us in the AI Profit Boardroom. The Agent OS is where the decision turns into an action — routing your leads, grading your enquiries, choosing what each agent does next.

The Agent OS zip — Claude, Hermes, OpenClaw and the rest in one place with shared memory
A decision layer like Jev underneath — leads routed, enquiries graded, next steps chosen
The 30-day roadmap, the video walkthrough, and updates every time we improve it
Four coaching calls a week — bring your own setup and we fix it live
Daily tutorials and a prompt library
A member map to find people near you building the same thing — someone's always online
3,900+ business owners already inside
Join the AI Profit Boardroom →Inside the AI Profit Boardroom · skool.com/ai-profit-lab
4 live calls a week · daily tutorials · a member map · used in 38 countries
§41Do this first

Open the playground. Run the refund one.

Your next ten secondsOpen the playgroundno signup,no cardRun the refund onepress onebuttonWatch the oddscome back inunder a secondThen decideis four daysenough?Then decide whether to try the full version
Open jevplayground.com →then pick “Refund Verification” and press Run