Tested Sep 21, 2026 · Laya 0.3.4 running on my own Mac · head to head with Jev

Laya AI: The Free Jev AI Alternative (7X Faster)

Laya AI is the free Jev alternative.

It does the same job as Jev, it does it about seven times faster, and on most tests it gets more answers right.

And you can run it yourself for free.

Let me explain what that means, because most people have never heard of Jev, and even fewer have heard of Laya.

Stop asking a brain surgeon to sort your mailTiny choicescustomer or junk?urgent or not?Laya picksin 33 ms,free, on your machineHow sure?high = act ·low = ask youThe big AIonly does theheavy thinkingThe free, open decision layer for your AI agents
The actual sources ↓
§1The tiny choices

Your AI agent makes little choices all day

Tiny questions, all day longAn email comes incustomer or junk?A message comes inhappy or angry?A task comes inurgent, or tomorrow?Pick one from a listsimple stuffRate it one to threesimple stuffYes or nosimple stuffClaude Code, Hermes, OpenClaw — they all do this
§2The problem

A brain surgeon sorting your mail

One giant model doing both jobsTINY QUESTIONSwrong jobSlow, every single timeCosts tokens every timeWrites a whole sentence backAgent has to decode that sentenceBIG THINKINGright jobWriting your blog postsBuilding your websitesResearchingFixing tricky thingsIt works. But it's the wrong tool for the small stuff.
That's like asking a brain surgeon to sort your mail.
§3What Jev is

Jev: text in, clean answer out

A tool from a company called TypeSafeYou give it textan email, a message,a ticketYou askone simplequestionJev answers"customer"94% sureJust the answer. Plus a number that says how sure it is.
§4Why the number matters

The number tells your agent when it's guessing

One number, two very different moves94% sure → agent acts on its own55% sure → agent stops and asks youHow sure?the numberon every answerThat's the whole reason these tools matter
The number tells the agent when it's guessing.
§5Jev's catch

Jev works well. But it has three catches.

The tool people have used for this all yearPay per useevery question costsTheir computers onlycan't run it yourselfAbout ¼ secondper question× thousandsof questions a dayA quarter of a second sounds fast — until it's thousands
§6Meet Laya

Laya does the same job. And Laya is free.

Out a few days ago from a small teamFreeopen source · Apache 2.03 daysold · from Convai Innovations4,000+stars from people following itAnyone can use it, change it, and run it on their own machine
§7What it does

Three kinds of question. One read.

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: a real billing email on my Mac. Laya reads it once and answers all four questions together in 52.7 ms — department "billing", how urgent, will they leave, do they want a refund.

§8Speed

About seven times faster than Jev

How long one question takesLaya · 1 question33 msLaya · 10 at once7 ms eachJev · 1 question236–276 msMy Mac · 1 question20 msTop three: published numbers. Bottom: what I measured on my own Mac.
§9Test one

2,000 business choices: Laya 0.766, Jev 0.727

The typed decisions test · 2,000 choicesLaya0.766Jev0.727Invoices · customer service · security · watching agents
Four kinds of business workSorting invoicesCustomer serviceSecurity problemsWatching agentsPublished by the Laya team · measured on their own hardware
§10Tests two and three

News sorting and emotions

Four news categories · six feelingsNews · Laya0.950News · Jev0.910Emotion · Laya0.595Emotion · Jev0.480The emotion gap is the big one
§11The sureness number

About three times more honest after tuning

Calibration — lower is betterJev · how far off0.246Laya · after tuning0.081When Laya says 90%, it's right about 90% of the time
§12To be fair

Not a perfect side by side

Where every number came fromLaya's numbersmeasured by the Laya teamOn their own hardwarea T4 GPUJev's numberspublished by other peopleNo Jev accessthe team says so themselvesHonest about it — which I respect
§13Where Jev wins

77 categories: Jev 0.870, Laya 0.425

The banking test · 77 different categoriesJev0.870Laya0.425Less than half. Jev wins this one clearly.
§14Why it loses

77 options, three or four words each

Laya has a fixed amount of room for your list4 options~60 words of room each20 options~12 each77 options3–4 eachSqueeze 77 choices in and they blur together · Jev handles 255
§15The rule

More than 20 answers? Jev. Or split it.

The workaround: two small questions instead of one big oneBig list50+ choicesStep 1pick from asmall list firstStep 2then a smallerlist secondIt works — but it's extra work Jev doesn't need
§16The honest picture

Laya wins four ways. Jev wins one.

The scoreboard so farSpeedLaya winsCostLaya winsHonest about how sureLaya winsMost accuracy testsLaya winsA huge list of choicesJev winsThat's the honest picture
§17 Where this fits in your business

Put a fast decision tool in front of your AI agents.

This month the daily tutorials walk through putting Laya or Jev in front of your main agent — so your Claude, Hermes or OpenClaw only does the heavy thinking when it needs to.

Daily tutorials — the decision layer, step by step, as it's built
The Agent OS zip file — the system all our agents plug into, one memory, one set of tools
Members already sorting leads and tickets this way
Four coaching calls a week — ask about your own setup
3,900+ business owners — many running Hermes and OpenClaw right now
Join the AI Profit Boardroom →Inside the AI Profit Boardroom · skool.com/ai-profit-lab
Set up in an afternoon · used in 38 countries · new tools added the week they ship
§18The most important line

Zero percent right. 95 percent sure.

The one line in Laya's write-up everyone should remember0%right · English model on Khmer text95%how sure it said it wasSure, and wrong. Every single time.
Sure, and wrong. Every single time.
§19The trap

A big confident number, with a straight face

The trap with any of these tools — Laya or JevText it's never seena new language,a new kind of messageTool says"90% sure"anywayAgent's ruleabove 85%,go aheadActs on garbageThe number only means something on text it has seen before
§20The Router

Laya is really three models

One front door, three models behind itEnglishOver 100 languagesBusiness paperwork · invoices, ticketsThe Routernew in thisreleaseThe Laya team built this to deal with the trap
§21How the Router works

It decides before the model runs

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: the same billing complaint in Hindi, Thai and Khmer, on my Mac. Left: the English model alone can't read it. Right: the Router checks the language first, sends it to the multilingual model, and gets "billing" every time.

§22How much it helps

With the Router: 45 of 51 languages work

You get the best model for each message13 languages · English model0.30613 languages · Router0.451English · multilingual model0.657English · Router0.783Languages that work well: 45 of 51 with the Router · only 23 without
§23Why you care

German and Thai customers, sorted right

If you have customers in different countriesNO ROUTERwrong pileThai email → wrong pileGerman email → wrong pile"90% sure" the whole timeNobody noticesROUTER ONright modelLanguage checked firstSent to the right modelSorted correctlyYou never pick by handQuietly wrong is the expensive kind of wrong
§24The practical catch

Out of the box, it reloads every time

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: six messages flipping between languages on my Mac. Out of the box, every language switch reloaded a model — about 20 seconds per answer here. With all models loaded at the start, the same messages took about 19 ms.

§25The fix

The fix is one setting

the one setting · load every model at the start
from laya import Router

router = Router(preload=True)
Load all the models once. Then languages can flip freely.33 mswith a GPU · switching costs nothing193–464 msplain CPU, no GPU at all19 mswhat I got on my MacEven on a plain CPU it's about Jev's speed
§26The second honest limit

That 0.766? It was trained on the practice test

Where the winning score really came fromModel threetrained on businesspaperworkTrained on thepractice versionof that exact testScored 0.766the number thatbeat JevThis decides whether Laya is right for you today
§27Without training

Untrained, it did worse than guessing the popular answer

Same test, all three Laya modelsLaya · paperwork model (trained)0.766Always pick the popular answer0.461Laya · English (untrained)0.362Laya · multilingual (untrained)0.342Random guessing0.318The two untrained models sit just above random
§28What that means

A fast base to specialize. Not plug and play.

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: the same 60 test emails Jev sorted for me two days ago, now through Laya with no training. Jev got 54 of 60. Untrained Laya got 36 and 28 — and never once claimed to be 85% sure. It knew it was guessing.

§29The free training path

One notebook. Two free GPUs. One afternoon.

The team ships a notebook that runs on Kaggle's free tierBuilds yourtrainingdataTrainsthe modelTunes thesurenessnumbersChecksthe resultsSaves yourfinishedmodelNo card needed · about four to five hours
§30The real pitch

Train it — or just pay for Jev

The real pitch, past the headline numbersSKIP ITcoin flipNew kind of questionBarely better than guessingBetter off paying for JevTRAIN ITone afternoonRuns in 33 ms on your machineCosts nothing per questionBeats Jev on your exact taskSureness numbers you can trustYour emails. Your tickets. Your leads.
Skip the training, and you might be better off just paying for Jev.
§31My example · leads

Lead, vendor, or noise?

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: 24 made-up contact-form messages (no real people) sorted by untrained Laya on my Mac — about 57 ms each against Jev's 392 ms. Laya got 16 of 24, Jev got 24. Fast already. Sharp after training.

§32My example · content

Which of five sites gets this brief?

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: one article brief, five possible websites, picked on my Mac in milliseconds. Across 10 test briefs untrained Laya picked the right site 8 times; Jev picked 10.

§33The pattern

Big agents do big thinking

Jev opened that slot. Laya fills it for free.Small choicespick one ·yes or noFast, free,honest abouthow sure it isBig agentswriting · research· buildingThe pattern is simple
Jev opened that slot. Laya fills it for free.
§34One more number

One in six angry customers sails right through

Rule: over 20% chance they're angry → send to a humanAngry customercaught → humanAngry customercaught → humanAngry customercaught → humanAngry customercaught → humanAngry customercaught → humanAngry customer"0% chance" → missedOn the emotion test, Jev gave the right answer a 0% chance 16% of the time
§35Laya isn't perfect either

Before tuning, the number is just decoration

How far off the sureness number is — lower is betterEnglish model · before tuning0.466English model · after tuning0.081The multilingual model ships with no tuning at all — tune it first
§36The lesson

Check the number on your own data first

Whether you pick Jev or LayaYour ownemails, tickets,leadsCheck: when it says90%, is it right90% of the time?Then letyour agentact on itA sureness number is only as good as the tuning behind it
§37Belief one

"This is for developers. Not for me."

Routers, tuning, training notebooks — sounds technical3,900+business owners insideManyhad never touched AINowrunning agents all dayMost of them started exactly where you are
Wrong: Routers, tuning and training notebooks — this is for developers, not me.
Right: A good chunk of members had never touched AI before they joined. Most now run agents that make these exact small decisions all day.
§38The whole idea

The idea is the hard part — and you just learned it

Four steps. That's all of it.1 · Give it the text2 · Ask a simple question3 · Check the sureness number4 · Train it on your examplesEverything else is a notebook someone already wrote for you
§39Belief two

"Free means worse."

Laya against the paid tool4 of 5shared tests Laya won1 of 5it lost · big lists of optionsA design choice you can work around — not a quality problem
Wrong: It's free, so it must be worse than the paid tool.
Right: Laya beat the paid tool on four of the five shared tests. It lost on one — big lists of options.
§40Belief three

"I'll wait for this to settle down."

Both tools are moving fastYour main agentClaude · Hermes· OpenClawThe decision layerthe skill youlearn onceThe tool underneathLaya 0.3.4 · Jev 1.13swap any timeThe skill doesn't change with the version number
Wrong: I should wait until these tools settle down.
Right: Learn the decision layer once, and you can swap the tool underneath whenever a better one comes along.
Don't take my word for it

Members post their wins every day — agency owners, ecom founders, course creators, solo operators across 38 countries.

Read the 158-page wins doc →
§41What isn't new

Let me be clear about what isn't new

What's new here, and what isn'tAnswers + a sureness numberJev did that firstOne-pass text-sorting modelsaround for ten yearsTwo old ideas
§42What's actually new

Three new things, together

What's new is three things togetherOpen + freebeats the paid toolA Routerpicks before it runsFree trainingsharp in an afternoonThat combination is the news
§43Which one for you

Under 20 options? Test Laya.

If you already use JevFewer than 20 → Laya is worth a test50-plus → stay with Jev for now50-plus → or split it into two stepsYour questionhow manypossible answers?Count your options first
§44If you use neither

You need a decision layer at all

The same shape, every timeTODAYone giant modelDoing everythingEvery call slowEvery call eating tokensNo sureness numbersNo way to know when to pull in a humanTHE FIXa decision layerEverything gets fasterBig model only for big thinkingA number on every choiceYou know when it's guessingThe bigger point
§45Going into the Agent OS

Small model or big one? Laya ships a preset.

real Laya run on my own Mac · replayed at reading pace

What you're watching: Laya's built-in preset scoring eight test requests on my Mac — how hard is this, from 0 to 3. "Is this email spam?" scores lowest. The database migration scores highest. That score decides which agent gets the task.

In front of Claude Code, Hermes and OpenClawWhich agent gets the task?How urgent is it?Does a human need to look?Decision layerin front ofevery agentThe first thing getting tested this month
THINKING IT? "Doesn't running an Agent OS burn a fortune in tokens?"

No. The everyday 90% runs on free local models on your own machine, free APIs slot in for more, and the big work goes through the CLIs you already pay for — your Claude subscription already includes the Claude CLI.

A decision layer like this one is exactly how the small choices stop eating tokens. And inside the Boardroom there are full token-efficiency tutorials.

§46 See it wired into a real business

Get the decision layer — and the whole Agent OS — as it's built.

The lead sorting for the agency. The content routing across the sites. The safety check on inbound before an agent acts on it. All of it gets shared inside the AI Profit Boardroom as it's built.

The Agent OS zip file — with the 30-day roadmap for your own agent operating system
A video walkthrough + daily updates as new versions ship, including this decision layer
The prompt library — ready-made question templates for lead sorting, ticket triage and content routing that drop straight into Laya or Jev
Four coaching calls a week — bring your own agent setup, ask exactly where a decision tool should sit
3,900+ business owners — many already running Hermes and OpenClaw
A member map — find the ones near you
Join the AI Profit Boardroom →Inside the AI Profit Boardroom · skool.com/ai-profit-lab
258 documented member wins · 38 countries · four live calls a week