Technical SEO audits
Turn technical findings into a prioritised implementation queue with evidence, ownership and clear completion checks.
Explore this option →An established service website rarely needs another unexplained list of warnings. It needs a clear account of what is broken, which business pages are affected and how to check a fix. Goldie Technical SEO — example explores that approach for businesses serving English-speaking markets. This is a concept referral website requested by Julian Goldie, not a new trading business or an active enquiry service.
Illustrative AI concept image. Not a completed customer project.
Compare the options that fit your project and prepare a clear brief for your provider.

Turn technical findings into a prioritised implementation queue with evidence, ownership and clear completion checks.
Explore this option →
Define what must survive a website move, assign launch responsibilities and agree acceptance checks before addresses or platforms change.
Explore this option →
Investigate missing service pages by separating discovery, access and indexing evidence from questions about content and search demand.
Explore this option →Images illustrate design concepts; they are not a portfolio of completed work.
Start with the pages that support your important services and enquiry journeys. Ask a provider to connect each finding to affected URLs, supporting evidence and a practical consequence. A fault affecting an entire service template deserves different attention from an isolated warning on an unused archive. Build a short implementation queue using business importance, confidence in the diagnosis, estimated effort and dependencies. Your developer should help estimate effort before that queue becomes a commitment.
Before commissioning a rewrite, establish whether search engines can discover the URL and access its content. Then examine whether the intended page is eligible for indexing and whether another URL represents the same content. A page that is indexed but attracts little relevant traffic needs a different investigation from one blocked by a technical setting. Google's introductory guidance distinguishes helping search engines find content from making that content useful. Read Google's SEO Starter Guide.
Turn 'ready to launch' into observable conditions. Agree which existing pages must survive, how changed addresses will behave and who checks the live site. Ask for a URL mapping, a list of launch blockers and an owner for each acceptance check. Record unresolved exceptions before launch so the business can make an informed decision. Google recommends preparing and testing the new site, mapping changed URLs and monitoring the move. Read Google's site move guidance.
Request tickets that describe the observed problem, affected template, intended behaviour and evidence needed to close the task. Group changes that share a cause so developers can address the template instead of patching individual pages repeatedly. Reserve capacity for retesting after release. The service scopes below are starting points for comparing providers; website size, platform constraints, access and implementation responsibility still need confirmation.
Ask how a provider would choose three tasks from a report containing fifty findings. Look for a link between the diagnosis, affected business pages and implementation effort. An unexplained severity score gives your developer little help deciding what should enter the next release.
A report, developer tickets and implementation are different deliverables. Establish who translates recommendations into work, who answers development questions and who checks the release. Compare proposals on those responsibilities as well as the initial investigation.
A useful proposal identifies unavailable data, sampling limits and assumptions that could change the scope. Ask what happens when the first hypothesis is disproved or a platform restriction prevents the preferred fix. Clear limits help you judge the work without relying on promises of search performance.
Bring your measurements, ideas and questions together before requesting a written quote.
Draft target market. Provider availability must be verified before launch.
No. It is a labelled concept referral website requested by Julian Goldie for his existing niche context. It is not a new trading business, and no provider relationship, verified domain or live enquiry destination has been established for this example. The pages describe scopes to discuss with a provider, not services available to book here.
Choose an audit when several technical concerns need investigation and prioritisation. Choose migration planning when an upcoming move needs requirements and launch checks. Choose an indexing review when a defined group of pages has an unexplained search inclusion problem. Confirm the scope first; a focused investigation may be enough.
Tell the provider before commissioning the work. Ask for a small initial queue with dependencies, developer-reviewed effort estimates and acceptance checks. Reserve some of that capacity for retesting. A recommendation that requires a platform rebuild should be identified early so it does not crowd out feasible maintenance.
The audience description alone does not establish that requirement. Confirm where the business actually sells, whether services differ by country and whether regional versions already exist. The initial technical scope should document the current structure and any regional configuration that needs investigation. This example claims no local office or city coverage.
No. Technical work can address documented obstacles, but search engines still decide what to index and display. Google's guidance states that following its recommendations does not guarantee a site's inclusion in the index. Agree measurable technical acceptance checks and observe search outcomes separately. Read Google's SEO Starter Guide.
Explore the service options that fit your priorities.